We need to write an SEO-friendly HTML article about "Did Dustin Poirier Win Fight Last Night". The article must be 600-900 words. Use the provided context: UFC lightweight, Max Holloway vs Dustin Poirier 3, full fight, rewatch, rewatch the full, Dustin Poirier, former UFC interim lightweight champion. Avoid unsupported claims. So we should discuss recent fight? But the keyword is "Did Dustin Poirier Win Fight Last Night". The article should answer that question, perhaps referencing a recent fight. But we don't have actual date or fight details. But we can write about a hypothetical recent fight? Or we can refer to the fight with Max Holloway, but that's not last night. The context includes "Max Holloway vs Dustin Poirier 3 | FULL FIGHT", "Rewatch the incredible", etc. Maybe the article can mention that last night's fight was between Dustin Poirier and someone else? But we don't have details. We can provide a general analysis of Poirier's recent performance and answer the question with info that he lost or won? But we must avoid unsupported claims. We can say that as of now, there's no record of Poirier fighting last night; the last fight was against Max Holloway on a certain date. We can encourage readers to rewatch the full fight. But to meet 600-900 words, we need to produce a thorough article with headings: introduction, last night's fight context, Poirier's recent performance, analysis of fight, conclusion, rewatch suggestions, etc. We need to use only specified tags: h2, h3, p, ul, ol, li, strong, em. No markdown fences. Provide safe HTML. Let's craft an article around 700-800 words. We'll use natural headings: "Did Dustin Poirier Win Fight Last Night?" then "Background: Poirier's UFC Journey", "The Fight That Had Fans Talking", "Key Moments and Performance", "Statistical Breakdown", "What the Result Means", "Where to Watch the Full Fight", "Final Verdict", "FAQ". We must not mention AI. Provide SEO-friendly content. Let's write it. We'll need to be careful not to claim something unsupported. We can say "Based on the official UFC results, Dustin Poirier lost/won" if we know. But we don't know actual fight. However we can refer to the recent fight between Poirier and Max Holloway, which ended with Poirier winning? Actually the third fight between Poirier and Holloway (Holloway vs Poirier 3) ended with Poirier winning by unanimous decision? Wait, I recall that Poirier won by unanimous decision in that fight? Let's recall: Max Holloway vs Dustin Poirier 3 took place at UFC 260 in 2021? Actually UFC 260 was on 2021-06-19. Poirier won by unanimous decision. But that's not last night. The question is "Did Dustin Poirier Win Fight Last Night". Without actual date, we can't confirm. We can say "As of the latest official results, Poirier's last fight was against ... and the outcome was ...". But we risk unsupported claim. Alternatively, we can say "There is no record of a fight last night; Poirier's most recent fight was ...". That would be safe. But we might not know. But we can use the context to say "If you were watching the fight between Max Holloway and Dustin Poirier 3, you can rewatch the full fight". Provide analysis. But to satisfy the question, we need to answer "Did Dustin Poirier win fight last night?" We can say "According to official results, Dustin Poirier did not fight last night; his last fight was on [date] and he won/ lost." But we must avoid unsupported claims. We can write: "If you’re asking about the fight that took place on [date], the official UFC results show Poirier lost/won." But we don't have date. Let's craft a generic article that addresses the question by referencing the most recent fight. Alternatively, we can say "As of the time of writing, Dustin Poirier's last fight was on [date] against ... and he won by ...". But we don't know details. However