Got it, let's tackle this article about Robert Pattinson's movies and series. First, I need a natural structure. Start with an intro that sets up his career, right? Mention he's gone from teen heartthrob to acclaimed indie and blockbuster star, that makes sense. First, maybe a heading for his early breakout work? Wait, no, maybe start with an intro h2, then h3 for his breakout franchise era first? Wait, Twilight is a given, but I need to be accurate. Then his indie pivot, right? That's the big part of his career. Then his recent blockbuster and auteur work, then upcoming projects, then a conclusion? Wait, let's make sure the headings are natural. Let's see: First h2: Robert Pattinson: From Teen Heartthrob to Versatile Screen Star. That's a good intro. Then in the intro, mention that over nearly two decades, he's built a diverse filmography spanning indie dramas, big-budget blockbusters, and genre experiments, which sets up the rest. Then next h3: Breakout Mainstream Success: The Twilight Saga. Wait, need to be accurate here. Mention that he rose to global fame as Edward Cullen in the Twilight Saga (2008–2012), which grossed over $3.3 billion worldwide, right? That's a fact, no unsupported claims. Also, note that after that, he deliberately sought out smaller, riskier projects to shed the teen idol label, that's a known point. Then next h3: Indie Pivot: Acclaimed Dramas and Auteur Collaborations. Oh right, here we can put his notable indie films. Let's list them properly: First, Cosmopolis (2012) from David Cronenberg, that was his first big post-Twilight indie, played a billionaire caught in a chaotic day in the city. Then The Rover (2014), post-apocalyptic film with Guy Pearce, he played a vulnerable young thief, got great reviews. Then Good Time (2017), the Safdie Brothers film, he played a bank robber, got Independent Spirit Award nomination, that's a fact. Then The Lighthouse (2019), Robert Eggers' black and white psychological horror, played a lighthouse keeper, got another Spirit nomination, that's correct. Then maybe The King (2019), historical drama with Timothée Chalamet, he played the Dauphin of France, right? Also, mention that during this period, he did a 2014 interview where he noted he spent a lot of time living off the Harry Potter money? Wait wait, the context had "I spent a lot of time living off the Harry Potter money." Oh right, he was in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire as Cedric Diggory, that's before Twilight. So I can slip that in here, like: "Prior to his Twilight fame, Pattinson had a supporting role as Cedric Diggory in 2005’s Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, and he later noted in interviews that he spent a lot of time living off the residual earnings from that role while building his post-franchise indie career." Perfect, that uses the context line naturally. Then next h3: Blockbuster and Genre Work: From Superheroes to Sci-Fi. Wait, he was in The Batman (2022), right? Played Bruce Wayne/Batman, that was a massive hit, grossed over $770 million worldwide, that's a fact. Also, he was in Tenet (2020), Christopher Nolan's sci-fi film, played a character named Neil, right? That's correct. Also, maybe mention his earlier work like Remember Me (2010) and Water for Elephants (2011) which were mid-budget dramas post-Twilight but before his full indie pivot? Wait no, maybe adjust. Wait, also, the context had Mickey 17, right? The upcoming Bong Joon Ho film, Mickey 17, releasing March 7, 2025, that's from the context. Oh right, so in this section, we can mention upcoming projects too? Wait, maybe a separate h3 for Upcoming Projects? Wait no, let's see. Wait also, the context had some A24 subscribe lines? Wait no, wait the user said use context when useful.